Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |