Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Ford Kuga 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Yeti is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |