Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 12 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.0 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Yeti is 10 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |