Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Ford Kuga 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Yeti) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Kuga) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 16 HP more power than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Yeti is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |