Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Subaru Forester 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 10 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 34 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 45 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |