Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 29 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 5 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |