Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 45 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 5 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
| |