Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Ford Kuga 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 24 HP more power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 70 NM less than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Yeti is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 410 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 5 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |