Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Skoda Roomster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 11 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1780 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Yeti has 45 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |