Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 45 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan 2007: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. Volkswagen Tiguan 2007 1.4 engine: The engine is characterised by increased vibration when cold, frequent antifreeze leaks and turbine defects. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Yeti is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |