Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti 2009 and Skoda Yeti 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Yeti 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti 2009 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti 2009 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti 2009 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti 2013. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti 2009 and Skoda Yeti 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 405 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`879 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |