Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 36 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Skoda Roomster. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti and Skoda Roomster are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 75 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |