Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Dacia Duster 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Dacia Duster is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 20 HP less power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Dacia Duster. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.3 | |
Skoda Yeti consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Dokker | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but higher. Skoda Yeti is 9 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 473 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1604 litres | |
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 68 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.5 metres less than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`725 | |
Safety: | |||
Skoda Yeti scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Yeti scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6600 | 5200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |