Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Opel Mokka. Despite the higher power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 34 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`959 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |