Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti and Suzuki Vitara have the same engine power, but Skoda Yeti torque is 100 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Vitara 2014 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2014 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 5 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Yeti has 53 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |