Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 20 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.4 | |
| Skoda Yeti consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 7 cm longer than the Suzuki SX4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.6 metres less than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`130 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`325 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 465 kg | |
| Skoda Yeti load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Suzuki SX4. Therefore, Skoda Yeti is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |