Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 23 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 164 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.5 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Yeti consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.59 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 108 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |