Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 11 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 398 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 76 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |