Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 50 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 10 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Yeti has 55 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Captur, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`749 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Renault Captur has
| |