Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 48 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1194 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Yeti has 28 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |