Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Opel Crossland 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 40 HP more power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 1 cm longer than the Opel Crossland, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | 1255 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.2 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`130 kg | 1`820 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`214 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 606 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |