Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 62 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |