Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 5 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1238 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 11 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford EcoSport, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |