Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 40 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Citroen C4 Cactus. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 3.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Yeti can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 7 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Cactus, 6 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 495 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`130 kg | 1`610 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`070 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 540 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Citroen C4 Cactus has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Yeti, so Citroen C4 Cactus quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |