Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 58 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 202 NM more than Citroen C4 Cactus. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 7 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Cactus, 6 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Yeti has 36 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Cactus has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |