Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki Vitara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 35 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 5 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Yeti has 53 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. This could mean that the Skoda Yeti uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |