Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 12 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.6 | |
| Skoda Yeti consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 322 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1665 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 62 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 446 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |