Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 18 HP less power than Opel Mokka, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Yeti can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Yeti version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Skoda Yeti 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. Opel Mokka 2016 1.4 engine: The Opel 1.4 Turbo engines with codes A14NET and A14NEL are 1.4-liter turbocharged units producing around 140 hp. They use a timing chain and a cast-iron cylinder block, which contributes to decent durability when the engine is maintained properly. With regular servicing—particularly frequent oil ... More about Opel Mokka 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti is 5 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`955 kg | 1`843 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`409 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 650 kg | 434 kg | |
| Skoda Yeti load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem more than Opel Mokka. Therefore, Skoda Yeti is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |