Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 18 HP less power than Opel Mokka, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti is 5 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Yeti has 49 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`955 | 1`843 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |