Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Peugeot 2008 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 40 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Yeti consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Skoda Yeti has 55 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`955 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 2008, so Skoda Yeti quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |