Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 2 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 360 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Skoda Yeti has 45 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`955 | 1`666 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
| |