Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Jeep Renegade 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 28 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jeep Renegade. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 131 mm (5.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Yeti can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Yeti version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Skoda Yeti 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Renegade, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | 1297 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Renegade may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 368 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`955 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |