Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Dacia Duster 2013

 
Skoda Yeti
2013 -
Dacia Duster
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 122 HP105 HP
Torque: 200 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds13 seconds
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Yeti engine produces 17 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.68.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway710 km on highway
740 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dacia Duster 2013: Duster`s 4x4 system is adapted from Nissan Quashqai. It has 2WD, AUTO and LOCK modes which are selectable with a button. In 2WD mode the vehicle is FWD. In AUTO mode, the vehicle is normally FWD, but if wheel slip occurs, the rear wheels are engaged to gain traction. In LOCK mode (available at speeds up to 60km/h), the center differential splits torque 50/50 front/rear.

Engines

Engine production duration: 9 years26 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.32 m
Width: 1.79 m1.82 m
Height: 1.69 m1.63 m
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but higher.
Skoda Yeti is 9 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres473 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1636 litres
Dacia Duster has more luggage space.
Skoda Yeti has 68 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dacia Duster.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9551`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Skoda Yeti has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 84006400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Yeti has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Dacia Duster has
  • timing belt engine
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv