Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 38 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller. Skoda Yeti is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 155 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`940 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`280 kg | 1`631 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 660 kg | 569 kg | |
| Skoda Yeti load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Skoda Yeti is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |