Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti engine produces 2 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.58 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1665 litres | 1269 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 25 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 396 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |