Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Skoda Yeti 2009

 
Skoda Yeti
2013 -
Skoda Yeti
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 122 HP105 HP
Torque: 200 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds11.8 seconds
Skoda Yeti 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Yeti 2013 engine produces 17 HP more power than Skoda Yeti 2009, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Skoda Yeti 2009. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.86.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Skoda Yeti 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Yeti 2013 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti 2013 could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti 2013 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti 2009.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway1010 km on highway
780 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Yeti 2013 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.22 m
Width: 1.79 m1.79 m
Height: 1.69 m1.69 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti 2013 and Skoda Yeti 2009 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres405 litres
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`940no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 86006400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Yeti has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Skoda Yeti has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv