Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Yeti 2013 engine produces 17 HP more power than Skoda Yeti 2009, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Skoda Yeti 2009. Thanks to more power Skoda Yeti 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti 2013 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti 2013 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti 2013 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Yeti 2013 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti 2013 and Skoda Yeti 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 405 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |