Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Mazda CX-3 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 4 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Despite the higher power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Yeti consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.55 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Yeti has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |