Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 28 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | no data | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.55 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Yeti has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |