Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 48 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Jeep Renegade. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Renegade, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1297 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Yeti has 54 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. The Jeep Renegade may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |