Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 35 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Yeti could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. Suzuki Vitara 2014 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM. However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2014 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is larger. Skoda Yeti is 5 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Skoda Yeti has 30 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`879 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |