Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Jeep Renegade 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 45 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Jeep Renegade. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Yeti consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Yeti consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 131 mm (5.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Yeti can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Yeti version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Skoda Yeti 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Yeti is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Renegade, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | 1297 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Renegade may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 368 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`879 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |