Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Yeti engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.7 | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Yeti consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Yeti can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Yeti version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Skoda Yeti 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1665 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Yeti has 31 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 446 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |