Skoda Yeti 2015 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Yeti engine produces 60 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Skoda Yeti reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Yeti consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Skoda Yeti over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Tiguan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller. Skoda Yeti is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1665 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 55 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 155 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`095 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |