Skoda Yeti 2009 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 160 HP | 136 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Skoda Yeti petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Yeti is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Yeti is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 410 litres | |
| Skoda Yeti has 5 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`065 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |