Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Yeti
2013 -
Subaru Forester
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Skoda Yeti is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Skoda Yeti also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.2 - 2.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 105 - 152 HP147 - 263 HP
Torque: 175 - 320 NM198 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 11.7 seconds6.5 - 12.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.1 - 8.06.3 - 10.5
Skoda Yeti petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, a Skoda Yeti with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Subaru Forester.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.56 m
Width: 1.79 m1.78 m
Height: 1.69 m1.69 m
Skoda Yeti is 34 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres450 litres
Subaru Forester has more luggage space.
Skoda Yeti has 45 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`982~ 2`027
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 84005400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Yeti has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Subaru Forester has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv