Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 - 152 HP | 110 - 210 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 320 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 11.7 seconds | 7.3 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 8.0 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
Skoda Yeti petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Tiguan. On average, Skoda Yeti equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Skoda Yeti is smaller. Skoda Yeti is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Skoda Yeti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`982 | ~ 2`174 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |