Skoda Yeti 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 152 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 320 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 11.7 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 8.0 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Skoda Yeti petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Skoda Yeti equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Skoda Yeti is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Yeti is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Skoda Yeti has 37 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Yeti is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`982 | ~ 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Yeti has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |