Skoda Superb 2002 vs Volvo S60 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 111 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.9 | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Superb consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo S60 2010: It has Haldex Generation IV automatic proactive all-wheel drive. Haldex analyzes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-plate clutch for faster activation when needed. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a max 50/50 torque split. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Superb is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1228 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity. Skoda Superb has 197 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`840 kg | 2`220 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`250 kg | 1`711 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 509 kg | |
| Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |
