Skoda Superb 2003 vs Volvo S60 2010

 
Skoda Superb
2003 - 2006
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP205 HP
Torque: 350 NM420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds7.8 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Superb engine produces 42 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km7.7 l/100km
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 210 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1470 km on highway
810 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.63 m
Width: 1.76 m1.87 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Skoda Superb is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 585 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1228 litresno data
Skoda Superb has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Superb has 205 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`190 kg2`110 kg
Net weight:1`605 kg1`580 kg
Load capacity:585 kg530 kg
Skoda Superb load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 16005600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv