Skoda Superb 2003 vs Skoda Superb 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 155 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Skoda Superb 2003 engine produces 8 HP more power than Skoda Superb 2002, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Superb 2002. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Superb 2003 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 2 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Superb 2003 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Superb 2003 and Skoda Superb 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
| |