Skoda Superb 2002 vs Volvo S60 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Superb engine produces 88 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 128 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
Skoda Superb is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 2`040 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Superb has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |