Skoda Superb 2002 vs Volvo S60 2010

 
Skoda Superb
2002 - 2006
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP203 HP
Torque: 172 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds7.7 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Superb engine produces 88 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 128 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Superb reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.48.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km9.7 l/100km
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Skoda Superb consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Superb could require 15 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Superb consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway1030 km on highway
710 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.63 m
Width: 1.76 m1.87 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Skoda Superb is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Superb is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data380 litres
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Superb is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Skoda Superb can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4002`040
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 18007400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Superb has
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv